DSL - A very small desktop oriented Linux distribution

What is DSL?

Damn Small Linux is a very versatile 50MB mini desktop oriented Linux distribution.

Damn Small is small enough and smart enough to do the following things:

  • Boot from a business card CD as a live linux distribution (LiveCD)
  • Boot from a USB pen drive
  • Boot from within a host operating system (that's right, it can run *inside* Windows)
  • Run very nicely from an IDE Compact Flash drive via a method we call "frugal install"
  • Transform into a Debian OS with a traditional hard drive install
  • Run light enough to power a 486DX with 16MB of Ram
  • Run fully in RAM with as little as 128MB (you will be amazed at how fast your computer can be!)
  • Modularly grow -- DSL is highly extendable without the need to customize

DSL was originally developed as an experiment to see how many usable desktop applications can fit inside a 50MB live CD. It was at first just a personal tool/toy. But over time Damn Small Linux grew into a community project with hundreds of development hours put into refinements including a fully automated remote and local application installation system and a very versatile backup and restore system which may be used with any writable media including a hard drive, a floppy drive, or a USB device.

DSL has a nearly complete desktop, and a tiny core of command line tools. All applications are chosen with the best balance of functionality, size and speed. Damn Small also has the ability to act as an SSH/FTP/HTTPD server right off of a live CD. In our quest to save space and have a fully functional desktop we've made many GUI administration tools which are fast yet still easy to use. What does DSL have?

Just a bookmark so I don't forget about this later.

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

Happy Canada Day!

Those of you not based in Canada will not see today's Google Doodle. I am sharing it here for you and to wish you all a Happy Canada Day!

Press on!

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

I am a C-H-R-I-S-T-I-A-N

Comments [0]

God Is Light

If God is light - which I know and believe to be true - then how does it affect our daily living? Our choices and behaviour?

If God is light and there is NO darkness in Him - how are we to behave? How are we to behave in the midst of all the darkness?

As He did.

Comments [0]

Five tips for writing non-fiction

There are surely no rules. But in the middle of a challenging but thoroughly enjoyable process of writing my next book, here’s what is working out for me:
1)    Get up early. I’m up at 6am every day, including weekends, to work on the book. Perhaps if I didn’t have other commitments – radio, newspaper column, blog, children – I’d be able to stay in bed later.
2)    Read people whose ideas or research you understand value. Read lots. Take notes.
3)    Read people whose prose style you admire and ask yourself why. These are rarely the same people as mentioned in (2), by the way.
4)    Keep the momentum going. At the moment, having done much of my research, I’m trying to do 300 words every day as a minimum. This low target means that no matter what other commitments I have, I have no excuse not to skim through what I wrote yesterday and add to it. This keeps morale high. It also means that when I can devote a full day to writing, I don’t have to spend hours reminding myself what I was thinking.
5)    Write quickly but expect to do lots of rewriting. I think there’s a virtuous spiral: quick writing means you can let go of earlier drafts that aren’t working. Slow writing puts you under pressure to get things right first time. That doesn’t work for me.

I follow the Undercover Economist with some regularity and thought this a good starter list for future reference.

My problem is that I write at night after everyone has gone to sleep... and this is not always the best time for my brain.

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

Ontario’s plan for electronic health records is at risk, official says

“It’s time the province decided if it’s really committed to this or not,” argues Doug Tessier, senior vice-president of development and implementation for the agency responsible for implementing the government’s multibillion-dollar electronic health records (EHR) strategy.

Progress on the province’s EHR file was hampered by the eHealth Ontario scandal surrounding compensation for consultants, Tessier says. The scandal triggered an audit, which concluded that the provincial government mismanaged over $1 billion and ultimately led to the resignations of former health minister David Caplan and former deputy minister of health Ron Sapsford.

“The swirl and scandal has hurt us,” says Tessier, considered the government’s expert on electronic health systems.

But Ontario’s EHR woes predate the scandal, Tessier says, arguing that there have consistently been delays in making key political decisions since the province first committed to implementation in 2000.

Deliberations on major decisions within the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care have often taken two years, Tessier says. “If you are really committed to this, two years is too long. … To my mind, if the government is not committed to something, they hem and haw.”

Moreover, even the basic, legal framework for patient EHRs —  which will require changes to laws governing patient record management and privacy — still isn’t in place, more than seven years after the province established the agency, Tessier says. Not only are “two or three pieces of new legislation” still required, “but we’ve also got to undo a number of pieces of [existing] legislation.”

The government must also do more persuade health regulatory colleges to overhaul policies that impact on EHRs, Tessier argues. “Let’s put our arm around them and gently bring them into the 21st century. ... With the regulations, the legislation and the policy changes that government has to do, that’s not so gentle. That’s on the critical path. If they don’t do it, we’re blocked completely.”

Tessier also argues that Ontario’s program to encourage physicians and other health care providers to utilize EHRs must be expanded. Under the program, the government absorbs 70% of costs associated with a physician’s move to EHRs. “But it only goes to 9600 [of 24 600] physicians.”

Physicians should be required to use EHRs, including applications such as e-prescribing, and to that end, the government should make the use of EHRs a condition of payment for medical services rendered, Tessier says.    

Tessier also notes that Auditor General Jim McCarter correctly identified that implementing EHRs in Ontario has been complicated by a decision to build the broad information technology infrastructure before developing applications. As McCarter stated in his report, that situation might have been avoided “had there been an overall strategic plan driving the EHR initiative from the very beginning.”

Tessier says there’s also a need for more standardization of platforms and systems. Ontario’s hospitals have developed at least nine different internal electronic records systems, some of which have cost as much as $100 million, he notes. Scores of subsystems have also been developed in labs, pharmacies and clinics. Ontario physicians use at least 20 different electronic records systems. 

Integrating those systems is problematic as many are incompatible, because of commercial competition between system vendors.

Moreover, such systems must somehow reach Ontario’s 13 million patients, said Bill Albino, former head of Smart Systems for Health Agency, the non-profit provincial government agency responsible for establishing a province-wide technology infrastructure.

In a speech at the Waterloo Institute for Health Informatics in March 2008, Albino estimated that a properly functioning EHR system would yield annual cost savings of at least 6% across the province’s $42.5-billion system, or about $2.4-billion. He argued the savings would be even higher as EHRs improve patient outcomes.

Brian Hutchison, a primary health care analyst at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, says there are consequences to Ontario’s failure to adequately invest in EHRs. Had the government recognized that EHRs quickly pay for themselves, and invested earlier, the health care system would be delivering improved care, he says. “It was a tactical error. We’re now paying the price.”

Without comment.
Just reporting it.

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

So if marketing works on preschoolers... what on earth are we doing to them?

Children as young as three years old are vulnerable to advertising, contrary to past research that suggested such marketing only had an impact on older kids, according to a new U.S. study.

Researchers at the University of Wisconsin and University of Michigan found that children aged three to five succumbed to the same marketing pressures as young adults, in that they understood the advertiser wanted them to buy something and that buying the product could make them happier.

"Young children are able to identify brands, to know what it stands for, know what this company sells," co-author Bettina Cornwell, a marketing professor at the University of Michigan, said Monday during an interview with CBC Radio's As It Happens. "They have a relatively profound understanding of brands that are marketed to them."

This is contrary to past research that suggested children weren't affected by brand symbolism until they were between the ages of seven to 11, she said.

However, Cornwell explained that the previous understanding was based on past studies that focused on the brands and products that generally had no relevance to children.

"But when you talk about the toys and foods they enjoy and that are marketed toward them, they really do have a strong understanding," Cornwell said.

In the two-part study, published in the journal Psychology & Marketing, researchers first assessed brand recognition levels in 38 children aged three to five. Children were shown 50 well-known brand names on cards and were asked if they were familiar with them.

"Almost all of the children, 93 per cent in our study, were able to recognize McDonald's readily, but they can also recognize Shell Oil or Pepsi, or even Toyota," said Cornwell.

Cornwell explained that brands such as Shell might be associated with adult products, but more likely the children recognized that Shell also had stores that sell nicknacks and junk food.

In the second part of the study, researchers found children were more likely to associate related products to brands that had been specifically marketed toward them.

"What I can say is we now understand more about how the young child develops his understanding, in the sense that their ability to understand the brand is also related to their social development. Now we can say the child understands, if you will, the mind of the advertiser. 'The advertiser wants me to understand this brand as carrying meaning, not just something that I want or that I have.'"

Cornwell said she didn't know if such early understanding of brands could result in a long-term brand loyalty, which is what many marketers are trying for when they reach out to children.

"We don't have longitudinal data, but one could argue that early child associations to an experience and a brand could have a positive influence on what they want to purchase in the future," she said.

Her hope is that the research and understanding it brings will be used by government regulators to protect preschool-aged children from undue marketing pressures.

"[The children] make decisions about what they need and want based on this brand-symbolic communication. It's a brand they need because 'I want to be liked by other children, I want to be popular,' and yes, that could expand the repertoire of purchases they might be interested in," said Cornwell.

via cbc.ca

I think as parents we already knew this. My little boy was able to differentiate all the logos well before he turned 3. In fact he knew which family member had which account at which bank.

I can't even imagine that past research even thought that children weren't affected by brand symbolism until the ages of seven to 11. Can you believe that?

This is with brands ... what about all the other messages? Sexual content? More and more cartoons have lines and messages not appropriate for the little ones watching them.

What are we doing to our children?

So if art imitates life... and the art in media is an imitation of adult life... and then our children imitate that. How much of their innocence are we robbing them?

What on earth are we doing to our kids?

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

Children's Ministry

As I embark in this new direction and return to Children’s Ministry I do feel a very specific vision that God is planting in my heart for both the Friday Bible School, Children’s Church, the Youth Ministry and the Family Ministry.  Just a few months ago I never would have expected or even wanted to do this.  But I do feel that the Lord has placed both the burden and the desire to do this… and I am sure he will provide the necessary helpers and resources.  I am not sure how often I will post here and I may do a lot of my brainstorming in my Spanish Posterous (Pensando En Voz Alta) but I just wanted to record it here since I am sure I will come back here from time to time.

So far I have found a few other bloggers who deal with this and I am looking forward to following them.  There is a pretty comprehensive list right here and I will explore these as time allows and I am sure I will reference some from time to time. 

One way or another we are losing our children and our youth… what is offered out there is more attractive to them than the truth of Jesus Christ.  We know this is not the case… but if their perspective is such then there is an obvious disconnect and we must bridge this.  For starters I will leave only one tidbit behind in terms of the direction I feel the Lord is taking me in … the family needs to become the nucleus once more.  As parents we have forfeited our place and given it to the government, the school systems, the media and even the church.  None of which were called to rear our children.  We are the parents and we must take our place… that is what I would like our ministry to do.  To help parents be parents… to help parents what their children need them to be… to help parents be the priests, the pastors, the teachers, the mentors … the heroes of our children.

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

Google and Disaster Relief

By now you have heard about the earthquake in Chile.  I am not going to write about that or comment about.  Of course we are praying for the country and it has impacted us since there is a large number of Chilean families in our congregation.  When someone in the body hurts ... we all do.

Instead what I wanted to bring to your attention is how easy it has become to help.  And how technology is in the middle of it all.  Attached is the picture of the Google page set up to aid in the relief of the Chilean disaster - http://www.google.com/relief/chileearthquake/.

Is Google at the center of everything?

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

WordPress and WordPress MU Merge in 3.0

The Merge

It was announced at WordCamp San Francisco last year that WordPress and WordPress MU would be merging codebases. This has now happened in 3.0-alpha, and we’re working on smashing bugs and tidying up a few screens. If you’re currently using a single install of WordPress, when you upgrade to 3.0 you won’t see any of the extra screens associated with running a network of sites. If you’re currently running MU, when you upgrade you’ll notice a few labels changing, but upgrading should be as painless as usual. If you’re going to set up a new WordPress installation, you’ll be asked as part of the setup if you want one site or multiple sites, so that’s pretty simple. If you want to turn your single install into one that supports multiple sites, we’ll have a tool for you to use to do that, too. So if you’ve been worried about the merge, have a cup of chamomile tea and relax; it will all be fine. :)

This is really exciting for me. Can't wait to test it and to use it... It is amazing how much the WordPress folks have done and now to come to this... I can't see any other blogging platform coming close to these guys.

Filed under  //

Comments [0]